DOG
|
Syn
|
DATE
|
08.29.2012
|
|||
WHAT ARE WE DOING?
|
Testing if dog seizure scent is detectable by a dog who has been taught to find human seizure scent
|
|||||
DONOR ID #
|
2
|
ORIGIN
|
Lily (K9)
|
|||
SCENT TYPE (saliva/spit/sweat/other
|
bile/vomit
|
SEIZURE TYPE
|
tonic clonic
|
|||
DATE of CAPTURE
|
07.24.2012
|
TIME of CAPTURE (before/during/after)
|
after
|
|||
SAMPLE STATE (cotton/gauze pad/clothing/other
|
cotton squares
|
STORAGE CONTAINER (covered test tube/etc)
|
bagged
|
|||
SAMPLE CONDITION (frozen/refrigerated/room temp/other)
|
room temp, refrigerated in between
|
AGE when USED
|
Sample 1Day 5
|
|||
MEDICATIONS
|
potassium bromide, phenobarbital given just prior to seizure
|
|||||
SUMMARY
|
K9 tonic/clonic seizure; bile samples collected on cotton squares; potassium bromide, phenobarbital given just prior to seizure activity.
|
|||||
SAMPLE SUMMARY & DIFFERENCES
|
K9 scent
Sample 1 |
All new hydrated cotton, HC1 Day 1 from Donor 2
|
||||
INTENSITY (# of holes
|
Saltshaker cap
|
Saltshaker cap
|
Saltshaker cap
|
|||
CONTAINER TYPE
|
Saltshaker in tin can
|
Saltshaker in tin can
|
Saltshaker in tin can
|
|||
PRESENTATION (hand/surface/wheel)
|
Wheel
|
Wheel
|
Wheel
|
|||
# of CONTAINERS
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
# of SCENT OPTIONS
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
REPS
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
10
|
% SUCCESS
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
60
|
70
|
COMMENTS
|
A*
|
B*
|
C*
|
|||
TARGET in #
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
EASE OF FIND
1 Very easy 2 Easy 3 Normal
4 Difficult 5 Very difficult
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
TIME
|
1:41
|
1:46
|
2:07
|
1:49
|
1:53
|
1:51
|
A* Interesting. Disappointing. We did some rounds before we started counting. Syn went around the wheel 5 times and found nothing. Excellent duration of hunt, but no recognition of anything.
I took the target out and had her touch it 5 times in my hand, then started this round. 100%. (I also picked up and fondled the other 5 bottles)
B* Same setup, but at 5 she picked #2 (no reason?), and stuck with it for the next 3, then got one right, and another one wrong. I took #2 out.
C* Very good without the attractive nuisance. Then after 6 she got 3 wrong in a row (always #6, which we haven’t worked in a week), and then one right.
I like that you have added "Ease of Find" to the Session Report AND that 4 and 5 are in red. AND that you have identified your Comments and joined them to the particular session with A*, B* and C*.
ReplyDeleteI would like to have known if anything changed during the A,B, and C trials. From the chart it looks to me that trial A was done in the second session.
That's why the colored columns, too, are an important addition to the form.
Was the blue session done with the same new HC sample?
ReplyDeleteIs this a HC from Donor 2? Which sample was the HP? Age when hydrated? Date of hydration? etc etc etc
ReplyDeletea) no, follow the the colours. Blue was done with the original.
ReplyDeleteb) The HC is from Lily, from originals taken that day out of the original bag of original frozen bits. I soaked 2 of them in distilled water for half an hour, then soaked new clean balls in the water. The fact that she found 60% correctly - I dunno, it didn't look at all successful to me, confirmed by the fact that she couldn't find diddly from them the next day.
Putting the results aside.....we must figure out a way that that creation information is notated and that each sample has a name on the report.
ReplyDeleteie Day 3 of Sample 5; Day 1 of HC1
Rather than having it only found by understanding the color coding. Unless I'm missing something that is already there.....which is very possible.